Reviewer credits
FSMA Radar issues are reviewed by named, working QA and food-safety practitioners before and after launch. Their feedback shapes the format and catches what a desk reader would miss. Credits here are public and dated — the same documentary treatment as our corrections log.
Reviewer credits acknowledge practitioner review of specific issues.
They are listed with each reviewer's written consent and do not imply
that the reviewer's employer endorses FSMA Radar. Editorial
responsibility for every published word stays with us.
Reviewers
Santoshi Muriki
Food Safety & Quality Assurance Manager, Affiliated Foods, Inc. — Amarillo, TX
Provided practitioner review of pre-launch issues
Credited ·
Contributions: operation-split applicability lines (manufacturer vs.
distributor receiving/supplier-documentation lens) and the three-line
recall mapping (hazard type / likely source / control point), both
adopted from issue #2 onward. Author of the guest essays
The View from
the Middle: What FSMA 204 Readiness Actually Looks Like at a
Distributor, 24 Months Out (July 2026) and
The
First 72 Hours: What a Supplier Recall Demands of a Distributor
(August 2026), and
FDA's
New Fresh-Cut Produce Guidance: What It Actually Means at the Dock
(August 2026).
Reader contributions
Laura Villarreal
Contributed practitioner refinement, issue #2
Credited ·
Contribution: refined the pasteurized orange juice item's recommended
action — a proportionate spec-language update citing the amended standard
(91 FR 45190) rather than a supplier reformulation inquiry, noting
reformulation decisions require full cross-functional review. Adopted in
issue #3.
Want to review future issues on the same publicly-credited basis? Reply to any issue.